Thursday, November 17, 2011

How Bebarang would fail


As I was cleaning up my “Bebarang folder” on my hardrive, I found this document I wrote this past summer and wanted to share it with everyone. Before going into NYC Seedstart, one of Guy Kawasaki’s videos inspired me to conduct a pre-mortem analysis on my startup: if my startup were to fail, why it would fail. For each potential failure points, I annotated how we were going to approach the problem and try to avoid it from happening. It’s funny how I never put “passion” in one of the categories… I didn’t know back then that would matter so much.
For the entrepreneurs, I thought it would be a good exercise to go through this process to understand what your “deep dark scary stuffs” are and how you could embrace it.

Sun Tzu has a famous saying in the book “The Art of War”:
“It is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle.”


Bebarang Pre-Mortem Analysis (May 2011)

Lack of Customer Traction (why?)

·            The price point is too expensive
o   For avg. 2-3 months of item rental, the value of renting vs. purchasing it is not high enough. (For a $10 item, pay $6 to rent out 2 months?)
§  Price Plan page comment box
§  Email survey
§  Phone survey
§  Account cancellation survey
§  Olark – instant chat service

·            We don’t have the right selection
o   There’s extreme demand to rent out popular – everyday wear items and less demand for premium designer items
§  Product Browse page “Tell us what you want”
§  Account cancellation survey
§  Olark
o   We don’t have the right brands customers want
o   There’s too much brands and products to customers (paradox of choices + intimidation factor)
§  Not a concern at this point

·            Not Convenient
o   Takes too long to ship the product
      • Bebarang is inefficient
        • Focus on regional customers (NY only) to reduce shipping time & shipping cost
      • Drop-shippers are inefficient and Bebarang has no control (think Zappos' issue)
        • 3 strike policy à lower discount for products
o   Poor service calls
§  Follow up phone call satisfaction email
o   Poor email replies
§  Follow up email satisfaction email
o   Confusing returning process (printing labels, etc)
§  Follow up returning process satisfaction email
o   Poor web user interface, complex navigation
§  Olark
o   No free trial?
§  14 day free trial – Risk Free

·            Not Clean
o   There are stains in the item
o   There are wrinkles in the item
o   There are bad odor/smell from the item
o   Regardless of the actual cleanliness, I think a big barrier is convincing moms that the clothes are clean enough. I would add in something along the lines of "Customers not confident in cleanliness"
§  Cleanliness page on the website – detailed process info, products used for cleaning

·            Mothers don't like to shop online
o   Have you looked at trends/sales figures for online shopping of baby clothes? Not sure if moms like to see/feel/touch clothes before buying
§  Update Mintel baby apparel industry market analysis report
§  Analyze online consumer behavior

·            Lack of service
o   There’s no buy-in option
§  Product browse page – “Tell us what we are missing!” comment box
§  Olark
o   There’s no package deals
§  Same as above
o   We don’t have any accessories/additional products available other than clothing rental
§  Same as above

·            Too confusing
    • Moms don't 'get it' or understand how to order. 
      • “how it works” web page
      • FAQ page – if we don’t have questions listed, ask us the question
    • Stumped by the large number of choices
      • Not a concern yet
    • Uncomfortable committing to a package
      • 14 day free trial

·            Doesn't align with mom's shopping habits/behaviors well
    • Baby clothes shopping dominated by impulse buying (Bebarang requires a certain amount of 'pre-planning')
      • 14 day free trial
    • Special event clothes buying usually done last minute
      • Don’t have a solution for this yet…
    • Hassle to sign up and have to wait for first item
      • 1-2 business day shipping guarantee – Operate the business with local region only



Not a Profitable Business (why?)

·            Cost to acquire customers is too high
o   Identify revenue per channel (i.e. tot. rev 30%/mommy blogs)
o   Identify unique visitor lead per channel (i.e. tot. visit 25%/facebook)

·            Inventory costs too much
o   Poor liquidation vs. drop-ship partnership (# of product) ratio
o   Poor # customers vs. brands/product ratio (cannot identify metric to measure when to order, how much to order)
o   Poor partnership cost structure (50% discount, 45 day term)

·            Logistics/operation costs too much
o   Cost of cleaning per item
§  Worker’s wage per item
§  Utility cost per item
§  Equipment lifetime value per item
o   Cost of shipping per item
§  Worker’s wage per item (pick & pack)
§  Shipping box cost per item
§  USPS shipping cost per item

·            Customer lifetime value is too small
o   Unable to retain repeating customers
o   The average revenue per customer is too low to sustain ourselves
o   The question is if you can get that customer value to increase by considering not only the individual but their friends and friends of friend. "Unable to generate/encourage word-of-mouth"

Thursday, November 10, 2011

My thoughts on startup weekend


I think Startup Weekend is a great program that fosters startup communities all around the world. I’m excited to see that Google has now jumped on board to support this movement. The world needed a movement like this.

Since the inception in 2007 Boulder, Colorado by Andrew Hyde, it has shown some promising companies. Launchrock, Zaarly, and Foodspotting to name few of my favorites.

However, I cannot help but to express my concern for this type of startup launch event organized to produce let’s-build-a-company-in-54-hours mentality.

For those who don’t know much about SW, this is how SW work. Innovators pitch their ideas for 60 seconds and attendees vote for the top ideas. Once top ideas are finalized, the chosen innovators are in an open market place to recruit developers and designers to help build their product for the next 2 days. At the end of the SW program, the chosen innovators present their final product to the judges and the winners are selected. Then you go home.

I worry about this model. There is no intellectual property protection for people who work together during Startup Weekend. Let’s say there is a guy called Vinklevos who came up with a really cool social networking idea and recruited 2 developers and designers. Together, they went through the Startup Weekend and finished the program with a decent product, but the developer decided to stop working for this idea after the program. Startup Weekend doesn’t provide much protection to help Vinklevos to protect his IP from the developers who decided to leave. They should help sign IP documents the moment they start the Weekend.

Another concern of mine is how you get to meet and work with people. Do great companies’ management team really get to meet and vouch for the next 3-5 years of their lives by getting to know each other under 54 hours? For the founders, building a company together is like marriage – the skill sets should balance each other and most importantly, they should get along together! Extremely well! This isn't a one night stand! You’re going to live, breathe, and work together for years!

I think Startup Weekend is great. But if Startup Weekend’s vision is to build quality startups coming out of the event, I challenge them to consider the consequences of a 54-hour speed dating, startup building community. It might be too near-sighted to really create an impactful community. 

Monday, November 7, 2011

Self Discovery


After I decided to no longer continue with Bebarang, I was lost. I was confused about what I cared, who I was, my values, and my passion. I didn't like the fact that I didn't have answers to these fundamental questions. Well, I had all the time in the world, so I decided to go into self-discovery mode. I’m taking some time to tour NYC museums, attend Carnegie Hall orchestras, and meet new people. These things have allowed me to have more self reflection time and think about what I'm doing with my life.

With the help of few of my friends, I started asking questions about myself. I meant to ask questions to myself to understand my values, my passion, and what I want to do in this world. It helped me to begin discovering who I am. Some of them are:

What am I naturally curious about?
I’m always curious about the process of a system. I always seek out for thorough understanding of why things work the way they work. I don’t settle for surface level knowledge and love to ask the question “why.”
I’m always curious about how I can be a better person. I enjoy self-development and seek for personal development. I follow many thought leaders to learn new perspectives on life and how I can avoid the mistakes others have made.

What would I like to change about the world?
I’d like to make the world smarter: smarter for people to have more opportunities to live a fulfilling life. I want to change about the world so that people can easily discover new ways to live a happier life.


As I thought more about myself and my entrepreneurial side kicking in, I decided to make a quick elevator pitch about me - Allen Kim.

Elevator Pitch

I am capable of challenging the status quo and bring up ideas that may be difficult to be brought up. I am capable of speaking my mind respectfully and not let others dictate my vision. I’m energized by tough challenges.
  • My greatest strength is my achievement-oriented personality. I am eager to take action and see results. I am highly motivated and optimistic. At best, I ensure that my actions are focused rather than letting momentum take over.
  • I’m a hustler. I know how to leverage my resources to get things done. I have great ability to analyze business strategy, customers, and competitors to understand where the business stands and how to move forward.
  • I know what I stand for. My actions are rooted in a stable set of values. I am able to walk what I talk and portray sense of authenticity and character. 


Challenges I continue to improve

Keep learning – I encourage myself to push past my comfort zone and enter unfamiliar terrain. I like to challenge myself to seek out opportunities to cross-team, or even lateral moves that will allow me to exercise new skills. I don't want to believe I'm meant to be just an engineer.

Think solutions – Identifying problems is an important part of any job, but looking deep into the heart of a problem and coming up with a great solution is what I think separates the truly nimble from the rest.

Being compassionate – Through Bebarang experience, I’ve been able to understand the value of compassion among team members. This is something I really want to practice and exercise harder. In the end, people are what matters most.
Be accessible – I will make sure to be more accessible to others and make room for off-line discussions and spontaneous meetings.
Treat others, as you’d like to be treated – Couldn’t be more straightforward than this. I will practice to respect others’ privacy, give honest and compassionate feedback, and show flexibility and tolerance around limitation.

Having the opportunity to reflect on my life at this time of my life I think is really great. I helps me understand what I ought to strive for and what I want to do with my life in the future. I hope to continue going through this process to better understand my self to make smarter choices moving forward.